Marshal Michel Ney - Napoleonic Wars Biography

Marshal Michel Ney - Napoleonic Wars Biography Michel Ney - Early Life: Born in Saarlouis, France on January 10, 1769, Michel Ney was the son of master barrel cooper Pierre Ney and his wife Margarethe. Due to Saarlouis location in Lorraine, Ney was raised bilingual and was fluent in both French and German. Coming of age, he received his education at the Collà ¨ge des Augustins and became a notary in his hometown. After a brief stint as an overseer of mines, he ended his career as a civil servant and enlisted in the Colonel-General Hussar Regiment in 1787. Proving himself a gifted soldier, Ney swiftly moved through the non-commissioned ranks. Michel Ney - Wars of the French Revolution: With the beginning of the French Revolution, Neys regiment was assigned to the Army of the North. In September 1792, he was present at the French victory at Valmy and was commissioned as an officer the next month. The following year he served at the Battle of Neerwinden and was wounded at the siege of Mainz. Transferring to the Sambre-et-Meuse in June 1794, Neys talents were quickly recognized and he continued to advance in rank, reaching gà ©nà ©ral de brigade in August 1796. With this promotion came command of the French cavalry on the German front. In April 1797, Ney led the cavalry at the Battle of Neuwied. Charging a body of Austrian lancers that were attempting to seize French artillery, Neys men found themselves counterattacked by enemy cavalry. In the fighting that ensued, Ney was unhorsed and taken prisoner. He remained a prisoner of war for a month until being exchanged in May. Returning to active service, Ney participated in the capture of Mannheim later that year. Two years later he was promoted to gà ©neral de division in March 1799. Commanding the cavalry in Switzerland and along the Danube, Ney was wounded in the wrist and thigh at Winterthur. Recovering from his wounds, he joined General Jean Moreaus Army of the Rhine and took part in the victory at the Battle of Hohenlinden on December 3, 1800. In 1802, he was assigned to command French troops in Switzerland and oversaw French diplomacy in the region. On August 5 of that year, Ney returned to France to marry Aglaà © Louise Auguià ©. The couple would be married for the remainder of Neys life and would have four sons. Michel Ney - Napoleonic Wars: With the rise of Napoleon, Neys career accelerated as he was appointed one of the first eighteen Marshals of the Empire on May 19, 1804. Assuming command of the VI Corps of the La Grand Armà ©e the following year, Ney defeated the Austrians at the Battle of Elchingen that October. Pressing into the Tyrol, he captured Innsbruck a month later. During the 1806 campaign, Neys VI Corps took part in the Battle of Jena on October 14, and then moved to occupy Erfurt and capture Magdeburg. As winter set in, the fighting continued and Ney played a key role in rescuing the French army at the Battle of Eylau on February 8, 1807. Pressing on, Ney participated in the Battle of Gà ¼ttstadt and commanded the right wing of the army during Napoleons decisive triumph against the Russians at Friedland on June 14. For his exemplary service, Napoleon created him Duke of Elchingen on June 6, 1808. Shortly thereafter, Ney and his corps were dispatched to Spain. After two years on the Iberian Peninsula, he was ordered to aid in the invasion of Portugal. After capturing Ciudad Rodrigo and Coa, he was defeated at the Battle of Buà §aco. Working with Marshal Andrà © Massà ©na, Ney and the French flanked the British position and continued their advance until they were turned back at the Lines of Torres Vedras. Unable to penetrate the allied defenses, Massà ©na ordered a retreat. During the withdrawal, Ney was removed from command for insubordination. Returning to France, Ney was given command of the III Corps of the La Grand Armà ©e for the 1812 invasion of Russia. In August of that year, he was wounded in the neck leading his men at the Battle of Smolensk. As the French drove further into Russia, Ney commanded his men in the central section of the French lines at the Battle of Borodino on September 7, 1812. With the collapse of the invasion later that year, Ney was assigned to command the French rearguard as Napoleon retreated back to France. Cut off from the main body of the army, Neys men were able to fight their way through and rejoin their comrades. For this action he was dubbed the bravest of the brave by Napoleon. After taking part in the Battle of Berezina, Ney helped hold the bridge at Kovno and reputedly was the last French soldier to leave Russian soil. In reward for his service in Russia, he was given the title Prince of the Moskowa on March 25, 1813. As the War of the Sixth Coalition raged, Ney took part in the victories at Là ¼tzen and Bautzen. That fall he was present when French troops were defeated at the Battles of Dennewitz and Leipzig. With the French Empire collapsing, Ney aided in defending France through early 1814, but became the spokesman for the Marshals revolt in April and encouraged Napoleon to abdicate. With the defeat of Napoleon and restoration of Louis XVIII, Ney was promoted and made a peer for his role in the revolt. Michel Ney - The Hundred Days Death: Neys loyalty to the new regime was quickly tested in 1815, with Napoleons return to France from Elba. Swearing allegiance to the king, he began assembling forces to counter Napoleon and pledged to bring the former emperor back to Paris in an iron cage. Aware of Neys plans, Napoleon sent him a letter encouraging him to rejoin his old commander. This Ney did on March 18, when he joined Napoleon at Auxerre Three months later, Ney was made the commander of the left wing of the new Army of the North. In this role, he defeated the Duke of Wellington at the Battle of Quatre Bras on June 16, 1815. Two days later, Ney played a key role at the Battle of Waterloo. His most famous order during the decisive battle was to send forward the French cavalry against the allied lines. Surging forward, they were unable to break the squares formed by the British infantry and were forced to retreat. Following the defeat at Waterloo, Ney was hunted down arrested. Taken into custody on August 3, he was tried for treason that December by the Chamber of Peers. Found guilty, he was executed by firing squad near the Luxembourg Garden on December 7, 1815. During his execution, Ney refused to wear a blindfold and insisted upon giving the order to fire himself. His final words were reportedly: Soldiers, when I give the command to fire, fire straight at my heart. Wait for the order. It will be my last to you. I protest against my condemnation. I have fought a hundred battles for France, and not one against her... Soldiers Fire!† Selected Sources Napoleonic Guide: Marshal Michel NeyNNDB: Marshal Michel NeyTrial of Marshal Ney

God Had Preordained Jeremiah As A Prophet Religion Essay Example

God Had Preordained Jeremiah As A Prophet Religion Essay Example God Had Preordained Jeremiah As A Prophet Religion Essay God Had Preordained Jeremiah As A Prophet Religion Essay God had preordained Jeremiah as a prophesier, even before he was born. As stated in Jeremiah 1:5: Before I formed you in the uterus I knew you, before you were born I set you apart ; I appointed you as a prophesier to the states. As hard a message as God gave Jeremiah to present to the people of Judah ( Jerusalem ) , God knew that Jeremiah loved Judah, but he loved God much more. Even though God knew that Jeremiah had a really hard message to present to his ain people of Judah, God knew that his love for God was even stronger. As stated in ( Romans 8:28 ) : Jeremiah hoped and prayed for clemency from God for Judah, even though Jeremiah realized that God was traveling to penalize them badly for their iniquitous ways, which included rampant devotion , ( something that God had promised He would judge, devotion, most badly ( Leviticus 26:31-33 ; Deuteronomy 28:49-68 ) . Even though God had saved Judah from devastation legion times, His clemency had eventually come to an terminal. Jer emiah knew this, but he still warned Judah that God s judgement was at manus. Jeremiah makes his concluding supplication for Judah to atone and turn back to God, even though he realizes that their devastation is inevitable. Jeremiah 29:10-11 besides states: This is what the Lord says: When 70 old ages are completed for Babylon, I will come to you and carry through my gracious promise to convey you back to this topographic point. For I know the programs I have for you, declares the Lord, plans to thrive you and non to harm you, plans to give you hope and a hereafter. Even though Jeremiah knew that God was traveling to destruct Judah, by allowing the Babylonian s conquer and destruct them, God was a merciful God, and He promised ( after 70 old ages ) to reconstruct Judah back into the land God had originally given to them ( Jeremiah 29:10 ) . This shows that God is good, merely and righteous. He neer gives up on His people, and there is ever a opportunity to atone and a opportunit y for redemption is ever available, if non to the multitudes, but for each person. Jeremiah besides presents a prognostication of the coming of the Messiah, Jesus Christ ( Jeremiah 23:5-6 ) . It is Jesus Christ who will be recognized as the true Messiah by Israel, and He is the 1 who will supply true redemption ( v. 6 ; Romans 11:26 ) . 2 ) How long, or to what extent do you believe the Lord will give prophetic warnings to people of the latter yearss? No affair how long we will finally be given a prophetic warning, we excessively must obey God, acknowledge His will as more of import than our ain desires, trust that God, in His infinite wisdom and perfect program, will convey about the best for His kids ( Romans 8:28 ) . However, in my sentiment, that is the million dollar inquiry that faces us today. With what s traveling on in the World today, you can clearly see that states every bit good their people, are non obeying the commandments and Torahs that were set down by God in order for us to populate the proper manner that He wants us to populate. Many modern twenty-four hours Prophetss every bit good as prognostications written in the Bible many old ages ago, have predicted current events that are go oning which are bespeaking that our current society is on the brink of prostration and entire devastation. We have been avoiding ( by the tegument of our dentitions ) devastation of our society, much like Jeremiah and Isaiah were for etelling to Israel and Judah many old ages ago. Finally, Isaiah and Jeremiah s ( every bit good as many other Prophetss ) prognostications came true with the devastation and dispersement of Israel and their 10 lost folks every bit good as the devastation of Judah 70 old ages subsequently by the Babylonians. It was merely a affair of clip after God saved Judah from devastation on many occasions, that God s forbearance eventually ran out and the words of the Prophetss came true. And with the same things go oning today, it will merely be a affair of clip before God s forbearance with us will eventually run out and our society will be destroyed, likely from a World War III or a atomic bomb. However, until that clip comes, we all have the opportunity to accept the Messiah, Jesus Christ into our lives, who was sent down by His Father, The Lord God to assist us atone, forgive our wickednesss, and put us on the way to redemption so that we will accept the word of The Lord, and acquire a 2nd opportunity to get down populating life the manner God wants us to. : Retrieved from: hypertext transfer protocol: //www.gotquestions.org/Book-of-Jeremiah.html 2/3/2010 Chisholm, Robert B. , Jr. ( 2002 ) , Handbook on the Nebiims, p. 153-223. Baker Academic. Grand Rapids, MI 49516-6287

Public safety - mandatory vaccinations on school chilldren (also need Research Paper

Public safety - mandatory vaccinations on school chilldren (also need outline)- - Research Paper Example doza-Vaca representing their minor children presented an Amended Complaint challenging vaccination practice in New York on both the state and the federal law grounds. The plaintiffs claim that they have sincere religious beliefs, which are contrary to immunization practice. In one of their Amendment cause of Action, the three plaintiffs claimed that their religious rights were being violated when the school excluded their children from the school institution because of their religious beliefs thus running counter to the immunization practice. The three plaintiffs argued that the school arbitrarily and unconstitutionally denied their children the right to exercise their religious freedom that was based on the vaccination practice (Phillips v. City of New York. (2014). In this case, the court consolidated the actions of the three plaintiffs. For various reasons, the courts granted the New York City Departments of education and Defendants City of New York motion and dismissed the three plaintiffs on the Amended Protest in its entirety. In reference to Philips vs. New York, number 14-2156-cv, Lynch, Chin and Korman who were the judges upheld the decision of Judge William Kuntz on finding the law passed on constitutional muster. In reviewing the case to terminate pursuant to rule, the judges were supposed to accept the realistic allegations that were set forth by the plaintiffs as true. The children of the three plaintiffs were therefore granted religious exemptions in reference to the mandatory vaccinations. However, despite their religious exemptions, the three plaintiffs still complained of their children’s exclusion from school on every occasion where their children’s schoolmate reported a vaccine preventable disease case. Vaccination against life-threatening diseases remains one of the greatest achievements in health in the United States history. Generally, millions of premature death cases have been prevented while countless children have been rescued from