Law of Cosine to Figure Area of a Triangle

William Shakespeare s King Lear - 992 Words

A prominent theme of King Lear that is widely discussed in typical analyses is the theme of finding wisdom amongst madness and clarity amongst blindness. These themes focus heavily on Lear and Gloucester: Lear becomes wise once he begins to go mad, and Gloucester gains insight once he becomes blind. This theme, though considerably more obscure, is also present between Edmund and Edgar. Both characters start the play in a state of blindness and have a moment of clarity once their lives are drastically changed. Edgar starts the story in a state of naivety, which blinds him until he becomes a target for Edmund. In Act 1: Scene 2, Lines 1-23, we meet Edmund in a soliloquy about his distaste with society’s rules over legitimacy and inheritance. He quickly reveals his plan to usurp his brother’s inheritance: Well, then, legitimate Edgar, I must have your land. Our father’s love is to the bastard Edmund as to th’ legitimate. Fine word, â€Å"legitimate.† Well, my legitimate, if this letter speed and my invention thrive, Edmund the base shall top th’ legitimate. (1.2.17-22). Although Edmund creates this plan secretly, it should be no secret to Edgar that Edmund would want some sort of inheritance, and the only way to gain it would be to take it from him. In a society where inheritance was only given to legitimate children, and often only the eldest, family tension was very common. Therefore, Edgar had little excuse to be completely blind to Edmund’s resentment. When Edmund tells EdgarShow MoreRelatedWilliam Shakespeare s King Lear1564 Words   |  7 PagesWilliam Shakespeare is universally known for his literary output both in poetry and drama. Whether through his laugh-invoking comedies or his heart-wrenching tragedies, Shakespeare’s plays have changed the course of literature. Many of his plays about love are widely praised by all, but Shakespeare s King Lear differs from the rest due to its definition of love. King Lear serves as an battleground between deception and compassion, between flattery and honesty. Rather than focusing on romantic loveRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s King Lear1550 Words   |  7 PagesINTRODUCTION: By facilitating the growth of evil within William Shakespeare’s King Lear, it is evident that the tragedy’s protagonist, King Lear can be held accountable for his own victimization and ultimate downfall. The most notable aspects of this self-induced victimization include Lear’s own lack of practical wisdom and divergence from the natural order, combined with the neglect of kingship, that enables Lear as a tragic hero to create the conceptual framework in which the ulterior motives ofRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s King Lear3086 Words   |  13 PagesJerion Young Ms. Woods English IV 4 March 2015 King Lear William Shakespeare uses several literary elements in his writing, elements which are especially apparent in his play, King Lear. Shakespeare uses excellent creativity and description when writing this tragedy. â€Å"Neither has Shakespeare placed in the mouth of any other character in this play such fatalistic expressions as may be found in King Lear and occasionally elsewhere†(A.C. 2003). The way King Lear talks in this play is very evil compared toRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s King Lear1611 Words   |  7 Pagesexperience life-changing events that jeopardize our sense of identity and make us question how we value ourselves. Our perception of our worth can change with what we learn through our existence, much like the characters in the play King Lear by William Shakespeare. Adversity and hardship are inevitable when characters are unable to connect themselves within their own identity or find a loss of self at some point in their role. The self-awareness, an essential a spect of their role, of many ofRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s King Lear1320 Words   |  6 Pagesothers. Having strong communication skills allows one to better understand the situation at hand. Proper communication is essential to working out problems because of this reason. In the play King Lear by William Shakespeare, Lear communicating with his daughters, Gloucester communicating with his sons, and Lear communicating with Kent are all examples of failure of communication, which later lead to consequences and hardships that the characters must face. Without proper communication, people willRead MoreBlindness By William Shakespeare s King Lear2212 Words   |  9 PagesMaysoun Deeb Mr. A. T. Lebar EN4UN-04 13 July 2015 King Lear Blindness by definition, according to dictionaries, is â€Å"unable to see and lacking the sense of sight† by which King Lear, the classic tragic play written by William Shakespeare, illustrated the concept of blindness amongst his characters as the leading theme. King Lear and Gloucester were the characters that have been conflicted by this â€Å"blindness† that may or may not change their personalities in the very end of the play. Gloucester becomesRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s King Lear1546 Words   |  7 PagesTwo Sides to Every Person There are two sides to every story; that of the protagonist and that of the antagonist. As shown in the Shakespearean play King Lear, there is very little difference between the two. Edmund, who appears to be a villain, is more than meets the eye. His evil is a rebellion against the social order that denies him legitimacy. His villainy does not come from innate cruelty but from misdirected desire for familial love. His remorse in the end displays his humanity and blindnessRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s King Lear1510 Words   |  7 PagesShakespeare’s King Lear deals with tragic human relationship like the other tragedies of the author, but this story was written in social aspect and raises the doubtful point on legitimacy of some political systems. In this play, various characters form multi-layered kconflict relations. Thus, the story is being propelled towards tragedy due to numerous inner and outer conflicts of each character. However, as it is brought into being a charact er, Edgar in the end of the story, it implies new beginningRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s King Lear1470 Words   |  6 Pagesduring the Elizabethan era, making it relatable to all audiences, especially the modern audience, leaving room for multiple perspectives and understanding of the play. Shakespeare’s play ‘King Lear’, depicts the main protagonist’s ‘gradual descent into madness’ as a result of the forces of evil acting in the play for Lear has, to an extent, have sinned though it can’t outweigh that he has been sinned against. This is confirmed through Lear’s injudiciousness to see through his two eldest daughter’s internalRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s King Lear 1306 Words   |  6 Pagesâ€Å"All...shall taste the wages of their virtue...the cup of their deservings. (5.3.317-320)† King Lear is frequently regarded as one of Shakespeare’s masterpieces, and its tragic scope touches almost all facets of the human condition: from the familial tensions between parents and children to the immoral desires of power, from the follies of pride to the false projections of glory. However, one theme rings true throughout the play, and that very theme is boundless suffering, accentuated by the gruesome

Welfare of the State in Four Sections

Questions: 1: Evaluate the nature of State welfare provision.2: Evaluate theories of Welfare: Marxist and feminism, strength and weakness, pros and cons.3: Assess the impact of class on health.4: Analyse a range of theories and explanations of health inequalities. Answers: The paper discusses the welfare of the state in four sections. The first section evaluates the nature of the state welfare provisions that explains the welfare and welfare state and understands the provisions required for having a welfare state. It explains the strength and weakness of the provisions of welfare state. The strength of the state welfare provisions are its being humanitarian, religious, democratic, practical and of mutual self-interest and the weakness of the state welfare provision is that it allows people to use the property as they desire with full right. There are several views for welfare state, the most common view is it is an ideal state where development of industries, society serves the work force of the state and helps the state to grow. Evaluates the two theories of Welfare, Marxist and feminism in terms of their strength and weakness. The strength of the Marxist theory is its explanation of the way capitalism has deformed the nature of welfare state. The strength of Feminist theory is their concern to the position of women and about gender inequalities in the society. The weakness of the Marxist theory is to consider the welfare of the society in terms of exercise of power and profit earned by the business class. The weakness of the Feminist theory is too much concern about the gender inequality and on female disadvantages in the society The impact of class on health has been assessed. Health inequalities are defined as a difference in the distribution of health determinants between different groups of population or as the differences in the health status of the people in the society A range of theories and explanations of health inequalities is analyzed. Here a range of theories and explanation of health inequalities are discussed. The theories have developed to explain the poor health of the working class due to the poor diet, sub-standard living, low incomes, Unhealthy behaviour, bad occupational conditions and psycho social stress. 1: Evaluate the nature of State welfare provision The term welfare is always associated with needs but it generally goes beyond need and refers to achieve well being, to have choices and to have the scope to choose ambitions and goals. The term welfare state means different in different countries. In some countries it means an ideal model, where all responsibilities are taken by the state for the universal welfare of its citizens. On the other hand, in some countries, it is used for the welfare provided by the country and in other states, it is used for the social protection that is provided not only by the state but also by the people who does public service and the volunteers (Walby 2012). The government has used the concept welfare state to explain the key role played by the state in the promotion and protection of the economic and social well-being of its citizen. The principles of equitable distribution of wealth, equality of opportunity, public responsibility are used for those who are not able to avail themselves the minimal provisions for a good life. A modern welfare state is defined by the sociologist as a combination of welfare, capitalism and democracy. The most developed welfare state is classified into three categories, Liberal, Conservative and social democratic (Walby et al.2012). In a welfare state a transfer of funds is required from the state to the services provided, like education, healthcare etc. directly to the individuals. Redistributionist taxation system is used for funding which includes larger income tax for higher income earner, known as progressive tax system, helps to reduce the income gap between rich and poor (Vogel 2013). The strength of the state welfare provisions are its being humanitarian, religious, democratic, practical and of mutual self-interest. The concern about poverty has led to the development of several areas. Some religions have made charity as one of their religious duty or as social responsibility. Several welfare states have developed from the mutual activities of groups and not by state activities. Democratic rights have helped to give social protection. Further, social and economic benefits are derived from welfare provisions. A country that has good welfare provisions tends to have less poverty and richer compared to countries that have less provisions of welfare (Stephens et al. 2012). The weakness of the state welfare provision is that it allows people to use the property as they desire with full right. It makes the people interdependent on each other and the social arrangement decides the production of the property. Further, it is true that property rights are important but other moral values should also be given equal importance. Further, welfare state weakens economic performances of a country. The provision of welfare state traps the people in poverty and encourages dependency. It excludes the people who are not part of the family relationships and welfare of a state is based on mutual responsibility and social network. Those who are not part of the social network are excluded from the state welfare provision. The need of finance for the welfare does not only depend on taxation but also on contribution by the volunteers. It is difficult get good contribution for the welfare state by the volunteers (Rose and Harrison 2014). There are several views regarding the state welfare provisions. Some says, welfare state is an ideal state where development of industries, society serves the work force of the state and helps the state to grow. It helps to balance the economy during recession. On the other hand, some are of the view that welfare state is a burden on the performance of an economy. Public expenditure done for welfare state hampers economic growth. It is difficult to understand the relationship between public spending and economy. There is not much of the evidence which shows that when a country spends more on welfare then it develops faster than the country which spends less on welfare (Palncia et al. 2013). 2: Evaluate theories of Welfare: Marxist and feminism, strength and weakness, pros and cons Marxist school has developed the theory of welfare state based on the relationship of the exercise of power. The welfare of the state is developed through the strength of the resistance of working class to exploitation. Marxist has seen the society in terms of the conflict among the economic classes. The dominant class were the owners of the means of production and the working class were exploited by them. According to Marxism, the welfare of the society depends on how the power is exercised (Murcia et al. 2013). Feminism theory of state welfare is different from Marxist theory of state welfare. It makes a commitment to change the society and relates the concept of welfare to the position of women in the society The theory have tried to explore the complicated relationship between statutory welfare services, capitalism and womens equal position in the family and at work. The theory has explained the different ways in which the female welfare are exposed to the disabling effects of welfare. It has developed theories of social conflicts that explain how the women are at disadvantaged in the society as well as in the welfare state (Muntaner et al. 2013). The strength of the Marxist theory is its explanation of the way capitalism has deformed the nature of welfare state. The Marxist theory have argued that economic system of a country requires to undergo some fundamental changes if the welfare state has to live according to its assurance to meet the need of the human. Further Marxist have gone beyond the quantitative limits of the welfare state and does not believed in the older tradition that says human freedom is dependent on the social relationships (Modleski 2015). The strength of Feminist theory is their concern to the position of women and about gender inequalities in the society. They have looked at the gender dimension to the existing theory of welfare state. In this regard, feminist theory have developed theories of social conflicts where they have explored the issue of conflicting interest among the men and women in a society. The theory has also exposed the inequalities of power within the home and the concept of women domination. They have tried to reinforce the idea that political is not different from personal. A women liberation in a society depends on her liberation at home. The feminist theory has come out of the traditional thought of practices at home as private matter and has played an important role in changing the structure of personal relationship and goals of females in the society that has given new ways to men and women to live their life (Meyers 2014) The weakness of the Marxist theory is to consider the welfare of the society in terms of exercise of power and profit earned by the business class. The welfare of the society is beyond the financial gains. It depends on the inner development of the human being which is not considered by the Marxism. They have given priority to class division in the society and have not spoken about the welfare of the females and children separately (Lahelma et al. 2015). The weakness of the Feminist theory is too much concern about the gender inequality and on female disadvantages in the society. In the process, the feminist theory has neglected the importance of male in a society and the development of the children irrespective of the gender. It is true that the welfare o a state depends on women development in a society but along with that other development factors are to be considered, which is ignored in the feminist theory (Jones and Higgs 2013). 3: Assess the impact of class on health Health inequalities are defined as a difference in the distribution of health determinants between different groups of population or as the differences in the health status of the people in the society. People from different social classes have different mobility and mortality rates between the elderly and the younger population which lead to health inequality. The inequality in health and inequity need to be distinguished in the discussion of health inequality. When the health inequality is due to the biological variation of the individual, it is beyond the control of the individuals. In this case, it is impossible to change the determinants of health and avoid the inequalities of health. On the contrary, when the health inequality is due to the external environment of the society of gender or class inequality then it can be avoidable. The unfair and unjust means of treatment to the people of different social class leads to inequality of health (Hobbs 2016). The social class treatment in a society has a great impact on the health of the people. If the different class of the people receives different treatment in the behavioural pattern of the society then it also lead to unequal treatment to the health of the people belonging to different social class. Classification of social class is generally according to the profession of the people with respect to the treatment received for their health. They are professional occupations, skilled, partly skilled and unskilled occupations and managerial and technical occupations. The social class of an individual influences the health damaging behaviour of a person like, consumption of alcohol, tobacco, drugs, use of immunisation, choices of diet, leisure time activity. The difference in the social class explains one-third of the differences in the health behaviour (Hennessy 2012). The people in the society who are exposed to poverty suffer more health hazard compare to others. These people are more exposed to air-pollution and damp housing due to their way of living and hence having greater impact on health issues. The children living in the damp housing has higher rates of respiratory disease. Such materialistic differences also lead to health inequalities among the people of different social class (Hekman 2013). Differences in the social circumstances may bring about differences in emotional responses which in turn lead to biological changes and further to health inequalities. Further differences in the maintaining the balance between work and home or the balance between rewards and efforts affect the health of the people and results in different complications of health. People who face poor home condition in the childhood are liable to get poor health in the future than people who face healthy childhood. The social class of the people has a great impact on the inequalities of health (Grant 2013). The social class differences arise due to occupation a difference that has an impact on health inequalities. The occupation which are handled by men are subject to more health hazard such as, dangerous machinery, exposure to toxic chemicals , motor bike racing, rock climbing and others. Each occupation has different impact on health and thus leading to health inequalities (Donovan 2012). 4: Analyse a range of theories and explanations of health inequalities There are a range of theories and explanation of health inequalities.. The theories have developed to explain the poor health of the working class due to the poor diet, sub-standard living, low incomes, Unhealthy behaviour, bad occupational conditions and psycho social stress. Three main dimensions of social stratification and health inequality are social class, social status and political power. The health inequality report has been explained through a report of a working group, called as The Black Report. The report explains the health inequalities through artefact, culture, behaviour, structural conditions and social selection. Health of an individual is largely influenced by the social position of the individual. The personal characteristics of an individual determine the behaviour of the people and their social position which in turns affects their health and creates inequalities of health (Burton 2012). The black report was published by the Department of Health in Britain to express concern of the failure of the Britain government in bringing improvement in the health of the people. The objective of the report was to gather the information about the health status differences in the social class and to understand the factors responsible for it. The report wanted to identify the casual relationship between the social class and health inequalities and to make suggestion to do research on the concerned areas. The report wanted to find evidences in the international and national levels of such casual relationship and provide solution to reduce the inequalities of health. The lower occupational groups have poorer health quality at all stages of life (Dale and Foster 2012). The report explains the measures of inequalities and defines the problem of inequalities. It looks at the social structure of health, utilization problems of health service, inequality trends of health and the evidence from the international levels. In this regard, the report explains the social inequalities of health. It also reviews the implication of such social inequalities and finds areas of research for future information. Some policies are recommended as a solution to the problem of inequalities of health. The services associated with health are also discussed in the report with some key factors relating to the social policy (Biddle 2014). The report has shown evidences of social health inequalities in Britain which is country of substantial amount of resources Such a problem of social health inequalities n a developed economy is not acceptable, The report suggest that educationally and socially a broader understanding of health should be encouraged and there should be some means to achieve the broader level of understanding. It includes improvement in housing facilities, income generation good working and environment conditions. There is a need to balance between the economic and social policies in highly industrialised economy in order to achieve high standards of health. The report has identified poverty as one of the major cause of social health inequalities and has taken it as a disease which cannot be controlled by medicines (Artz 2012). Further the report says provisions for better medical service is very important and should be given to all without any reservation in its distribution to the social class people. A system of health service must be made that reaches to everybody without any discrimination between sick and healthy, poor and rich. Moreover, it is important to have evaluation system to understand the progress of the policies and to find out the reason for not achieving the objectives and to find out the obstacles so that solution can be achieved (Barr 2014). Hence the objective of any state should be to achieve equality of health among the social class and to remove all the obstacles that come in the way of attaining the equality and removing all kinds of inequalities in the health status of the people of different social class. References Artz, L., 2012. Globalization, media hegemony, and social class. Globalization of Corporate Media Hegemony, The: Evaluating California's Imprisonment Crisis, p.1. Barr, D.A., 2014. Health disparities in the United States: Social class, race, ethnicity, and health. JHU Press. Biddle, B., 2014. Social class, poverty and education. Routledge. Burton, C., 2012. Subordination (RLE Feminist Theory): Feminism and Social Theory. Routledge. Dale, J. and Foster, P. eds., 2012. Feminists and State Welfare (RLE Feminist Theory). Routledge. Donovan, J., 2012. Feminist theory: The intellectual traditions. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. Grant, J., 2013. Fundamental feminism: Contesting the core concepts of feminist theory. Routledge. Hekman, S., 2013. The future of differences: Truth and method in feminist theory. John Wiley Sons. Hennessy, R., 2012. Materialist Feminism and the Politics of Discourse (RLE Feminist Theory) (Vol. 21). Routledge. Hobbs, G., 2016. Explaining social class inequalities in educational achievement in the UK: quantifying the contribution of social class differences in school effectiveness. Oxford Review of Education, 42(1), pp.16-35. Jones, I.R. and Higgs, P., 2013. Class and health inequalities in later life. Social class in later life: Power, identity and lifestyle, pp.113-122. Lahelma, E., Pietilinen, O., Rahkonen, O., Kivimki, M., Martikainen, P., Ferrie, J., Marmot, M., Shipley, M., Sekine, M., Tatsuse, T. and Lallukka, T., 2015. Social class inequalities in health among occupational cohorts from Finland, Britain and Japan: A follow up study. Health place, 31, pp.173-179. Meyers, D.T., 2014. Feminist social thought: a reader. Routledge. Modleski, T., 2015. The women who knew too much: Hitchcock and feminist theory. Routledge. Muntaner, C., Ng, E., Vanroelen, C., Christ, S. and Eaton, W.W., 2013. Social stratification, social closure, and social class as determinants of mental health disparities. In Handbook of the sociology of mental health (pp. 205-227). Springer Netherlands. Murcia, M., Chastang, J.F., Cohidon, C., Niedhammer, I. and Samotrace study group, 2013. Contribution of occupational factors to social inequalities in self-reported health among French employees. International archives of occupational and environmental health, 86(5), pp.541-552. Palncia, L., Espelt, A., Rodrguez-Sanz, M., Rocha, K.B., Pasarn, M.I. and Borrell, C., 2013. Trends in social class inequalities in the use of health care services within the Spanish National Health System, 19932006. The European Journal of Health Economics, 14(2), pp.211-219. Rose, D. and Harrison, E. eds., 2014. Social class in Europe: An introduction to the European socio-economic classification. Routledge. Stephens, N.M., Markus, H.R. and Fryberg, S.A., 2012. Social class disparities in health and education: Reducing inequality by applying a sociocultural self model of behavior. Psychological review, 119(4), p.723. Vogel, L., 2013. Marxism and the oppression of women: Toward a unitary theory. Brill. Walby, S., Armstrong, J. and Strid, S., 2012. Intersectionality: Multiple inequalities in social theory. Sociology, p.0038038511416164.

The Wiccan Religion Essays - Wicca, Modern Paganism,

The Wiccan Religion The word "Witchcraft" dates back many hundred of years and means literally "The craft of the wise". This is because the Witches of the old were the wise ones of their village, knowledgeable in the art of healing, legal matters and spiritual fulfillment. A Witch had to not only be a religious leader, but also the doctor, lawyer, and psychologist of the village. Today, people have reclaimed this word in their pursuit of Wiccan religion. A With is an initiate of Wicca, one who has earned the right to call themselves Priest, or Priestess, through study, self evaluation, and spiritual living. Wicca itself, is an attempt to re-create European (mostly) Shamansistic Nature Religion, adapting it to fit our modern lives. Witches are worshippers of the Earth and it^?s many cycles. We believe that deity is found not only outside to our realm, or plane of existence, but that is found within every living thing and all that support it. Therefore, we attempt to live in harmony with the Earth and each of it's creatures. Wiccan tend to involve themselves with ecological pursuits. Wicca observe the holidays of Pagan Europe; Eight festivals spaced evenly about the wheel of the year, at the quarters (equinox^?s and solstices) and the cross-quarters (midpoints between the equinox^?s and solstices). They are called: Yule (Dec 21) Tmbolc (Feb2), Lady Day (March 21), Beltaine (May 1), Midsummer (June 21), Lugnassed (Aug 1), Mabon (Sept 21), and Samhain (Oct 31). Actual dates vary slightly from year to year, as they are based upon actual celestial events. Many Wiccans also celebrate the Full Moon, of which we have 13 per year. The basis for Wiccans moral conduct is found in the statement "An Ye Harm None, Do What Thou Wilt." This is a mock archaic phrase, suggesting that any behavior that harms none, is morally acceptable. Harm is defined by anything that takes away, or works against an individual^?s free will. It is, of course, impossible to exist, or even cease to exist, without causing harm, so Wiccans look to fulfill this as closely as possible. A Wiccan attempts to make choices based on what will cause the least harm, and promote the greatest overall positive effect. Wicca teaches self discipline, personal responsibility kinship ith our plant and its creatures, open-mindedness and the virtues of diversity. Wiccans do not proselytize, as we believe that each must find the path that is right for them, and that all religions are different paths to the same truths. We draw our beliefs and practices from our own experiences, and that of others, understanding that age does not makes a religion any more valid, not does political support, numbers of followers or material holdings of its temple. Religion is a very personal thing, one which can only be validated by the experience of the individual. Wicca provides a link for those who follow similar paths to share their experiences.

Marshal Michel Ney - Napoleonic Wars Biography

Marshal Michel Ney - Napoleonic Wars Biography Michel Ney - Early Life: Born in Saarlouis, France on January 10, 1769, Michel Ney was the son of master barrel cooper Pierre Ney and his wife Margarethe. Due to Saarlouis location in Lorraine, Ney was raised bilingual and was fluent in both French and German. Coming of age, he received his education at the Collà ¨ge des Augustins and became a notary in his hometown. After a brief stint as an overseer of mines, he ended his career as a civil servant and enlisted in the Colonel-General Hussar Regiment in 1787. Proving himself a gifted soldier, Ney swiftly moved through the non-commissioned ranks. Michel Ney - Wars of the French Revolution: With the beginning of the French Revolution, Neys regiment was assigned to the Army of the North. In September 1792, he was present at the French victory at Valmy and was commissioned as an officer the next month. The following year he served at the Battle of Neerwinden and was wounded at the siege of Mainz. Transferring to the Sambre-et-Meuse in June 1794, Neys talents were quickly recognized and he continued to advance in rank, reaching gà ©nà ©ral de brigade in August 1796. With this promotion came command of the French cavalry on the German front. In April 1797, Ney led the cavalry at the Battle of Neuwied. Charging a body of Austrian lancers that were attempting to seize French artillery, Neys men found themselves counterattacked by enemy cavalry. In the fighting that ensued, Ney was unhorsed and taken prisoner. He remained a prisoner of war for a month until being exchanged in May. Returning to active service, Ney participated in the capture of Mannheim later that year. Two years later he was promoted to gà ©neral de division in March 1799. Commanding the cavalry in Switzerland and along the Danube, Ney was wounded in the wrist and thigh at Winterthur. Recovering from his wounds, he joined General Jean Moreaus Army of the Rhine and took part in the victory at the Battle of Hohenlinden on December 3, 1800. In 1802, he was assigned to command French troops in Switzerland and oversaw French diplomacy in the region. On August 5 of that year, Ney returned to France to marry Aglaà © Louise Auguià ©. The couple would be married for the remainder of Neys life and would have four sons. Michel Ney - Napoleonic Wars: With the rise of Napoleon, Neys career accelerated as he was appointed one of the first eighteen Marshals of the Empire on May 19, 1804. Assuming command of the VI Corps of the La Grand Armà ©e the following year, Ney defeated the Austrians at the Battle of Elchingen that October. Pressing into the Tyrol, he captured Innsbruck a month later. During the 1806 campaign, Neys VI Corps took part in the Battle of Jena on October 14, and then moved to occupy Erfurt and capture Magdeburg. As winter set in, the fighting continued and Ney played a key role in rescuing the French army at the Battle of Eylau on February 8, 1807. Pressing on, Ney participated in the Battle of Gà ¼ttstadt and commanded the right wing of the army during Napoleons decisive triumph against the Russians at Friedland on June 14. For his exemplary service, Napoleon created him Duke of Elchingen on June 6, 1808. Shortly thereafter, Ney and his corps were dispatched to Spain. After two years on the Iberian Peninsula, he was ordered to aid in the invasion of Portugal. After capturing Ciudad Rodrigo and Coa, he was defeated at the Battle of Buà §aco. Working with Marshal Andrà © Massà ©na, Ney and the French flanked the British position and continued their advance until they were turned back at the Lines of Torres Vedras. Unable to penetrate the allied defenses, Massà ©na ordered a retreat. During the withdrawal, Ney was removed from command for insubordination. Returning to France, Ney was given command of the III Corps of the La Grand Armà ©e for the 1812 invasion of Russia. In August of that year, he was wounded in the neck leading his men at the Battle of Smolensk. As the French drove further into Russia, Ney commanded his men in the central section of the French lines at the Battle of Borodino on September 7, 1812. With the collapse of the invasion later that year, Ney was assigned to command the French rearguard as Napoleon retreated back to France. Cut off from the main body of the army, Neys men were able to fight their way through and rejoin their comrades. For this action he was dubbed the bravest of the brave by Napoleon. After taking part in the Battle of Berezina, Ney helped hold the bridge at Kovno and reputedly was the last French soldier to leave Russian soil. In reward for his service in Russia, he was given the title Prince of the Moskowa on March 25, 1813. As the War of the Sixth Coalition raged, Ney took part in the victories at Là ¼tzen and Bautzen. That fall he was present when French troops were defeated at the Battles of Dennewitz and Leipzig. With the French Empire collapsing, Ney aided in defending France through early 1814, but became the spokesman for the Marshals revolt in April and encouraged Napoleon to abdicate. With the defeat of Napoleon and restoration of Louis XVIII, Ney was promoted and made a peer for his role in the revolt. Michel Ney - The Hundred Days Death: Neys loyalty to the new regime was quickly tested in 1815, with Napoleons return to France from Elba. Swearing allegiance to the king, he began assembling forces to counter Napoleon and pledged to bring the former emperor back to Paris in an iron cage. Aware of Neys plans, Napoleon sent him a letter encouraging him to rejoin his old commander. This Ney did on March 18, when he joined Napoleon at Auxerre Three months later, Ney was made the commander of the left wing of the new Army of the North. In this role, he defeated the Duke of Wellington at the Battle of Quatre Bras on June 16, 1815. Two days later, Ney played a key role at the Battle of Waterloo. His most famous order during the decisive battle was to send forward the French cavalry against the allied lines. Surging forward, they were unable to break the squares formed by the British infantry and were forced to retreat. Following the defeat at Waterloo, Ney was hunted down arrested. Taken into custody on August 3, he was tried for treason that December by the Chamber of Peers. Found guilty, he was executed by firing squad near the Luxembourg Garden on December 7, 1815. During his execution, Ney refused to wear a blindfold and insisted upon giving the order to fire himself. His final words were reportedly: Soldiers, when I give the command to fire, fire straight at my heart. Wait for the order. It will be my last to you. I protest against my condemnation. I have fought a hundred battles for France, and not one against her... Soldiers Fire!† Selected Sources Napoleonic Guide: Marshal Michel NeyNNDB: Marshal Michel NeyTrial of Marshal Ney

God Had Preordained Jeremiah As A Prophet Religion Essay Example

God Had Preordained Jeremiah As A Prophet Religion Essay Example God Had Preordained Jeremiah As A Prophet Religion Essay God Had Preordained Jeremiah As A Prophet Religion Essay God had preordained Jeremiah as a prophesier, even before he was born. As stated in Jeremiah 1:5: Before I formed you in the uterus I knew you, before you were born I set you apart ; I appointed you as a prophesier to the states. As hard a message as God gave Jeremiah to present to the people of Judah ( Jerusalem ) , God knew that Jeremiah loved Judah, but he loved God much more. Even though God knew that Jeremiah had a really hard message to present to his ain people of Judah, God knew that his love for God was even stronger. As stated in ( Romans 8:28 ) : Jeremiah hoped and prayed for clemency from God for Judah, even though Jeremiah realized that God was traveling to penalize them badly for their iniquitous ways, which included rampant devotion , ( something that God had promised He would judge, devotion, most badly ( Leviticus 26:31-33 ; Deuteronomy 28:49-68 ) . Even though God had saved Judah from devastation legion times, His clemency had eventually come to an terminal. Jer emiah knew this, but he still warned Judah that God s judgement was at manus. Jeremiah makes his concluding supplication for Judah to atone and turn back to God, even though he realizes that their devastation is inevitable. Jeremiah 29:10-11 besides states: This is what the Lord says: When 70 old ages are completed for Babylon, I will come to you and carry through my gracious promise to convey you back to this topographic point. For I know the programs I have for you, declares the Lord, plans to thrive you and non to harm you, plans to give you hope and a hereafter. Even though Jeremiah knew that God was traveling to destruct Judah, by allowing the Babylonian s conquer and destruct them, God was a merciful God, and He promised ( after 70 old ages ) to reconstruct Judah back into the land God had originally given to them ( Jeremiah 29:10 ) . This shows that God is good, merely and righteous. He neer gives up on His people, and there is ever a opportunity to atone and a opportunit y for redemption is ever available, if non to the multitudes, but for each person. Jeremiah besides presents a prognostication of the coming of the Messiah, Jesus Christ ( Jeremiah 23:5-6 ) . It is Jesus Christ who will be recognized as the true Messiah by Israel, and He is the 1 who will supply true redemption ( v. 6 ; Romans 11:26 ) . 2 ) How long, or to what extent do you believe the Lord will give prophetic warnings to people of the latter yearss? No affair how long we will finally be given a prophetic warning, we excessively must obey God, acknowledge His will as more of import than our ain desires, trust that God, in His infinite wisdom and perfect program, will convey about the best for His kids ( Romans 8:28 ) . However, in my sentiment, that is the million dollar inquiry that faces us today. With what s traveling on in the World today, you can clearly see that states every bit good their people, are non obeying the commandments and Torahs that were set down by God in order for us to populate the proper manner that He wants us to populate. Many modern twenty-four hours Prophetss every bit good as prognostications written in the Bible many old ages ago, have predicted current events that are go oning which are bespeaking that our current society is on the brink of prostration and entire devastation. We have been avoiding ( by the tegument of our dentitions ) devastation of our society, much like Jeremiah and Isaiah were for etelling to Israel and Judah many old ages ago. Finally, Isaiah and Jeremiah s ( every bit good as many other Prophetss ) prognostications came true with the devastation and dispersement of Israel and their 10 lost folks every bit good as the devastation of Judah 70 old ages subsequently by the Babylonians. It was merely a affair of clip after God saved Judah from devastation on many occasions, that God s forbearance eventually ran out and the words of the Prophetss came true. And with the same things go oning today, it will merely be a affair of clip before God s forbearance with us will eventually run out and our society will be destroyed, likely from a World War III or a atomic bomb. However, until that clip comes, we all have the opportunity to accept the Messiah, Jesus Christ into our lives, who was sent down by His Father, The Lord God to assist us atone, forgive our wickednesss, and put us on the way to redemption so that we will accept the word of The Lord, and acquire a 2nd opportunity to get down populating life the manner God wants us to. : Retrieved from: hypertext transfer protocol: //www.gotquestions.org/Book-of-Jeremiah.html 2/3/2010 Chisholm, Robert B. , Jr. ( 2002 ) , Handbook on the Nebiims, p. 153-223. Baker Academic. Grand Rapids, MI 49516-6287

Public safety - mandatory vaccinations on school chilldren (also need Research Paper

Public safety - mandatory vaccinations on school chilldren (also need outline)- - Research Paper Example doza-Vaca representing their minor children presented an Amended Complaint challenging vaccination practice in New York on both the state and the federal law grounds. The plaintiffs claim that they have sincere religious beliefs, which are contrary to immunization practice. In one of their Amendment cause of Action, the three plaintiffs claimed that their religious rights were being violated when the school excluded their children from the school institution because of their religious beliefs thus running counter to the immunization practice. The three plaintiffs argued that the school arbitrarily and unconstitutionally denied their children the right to exercise their religious freedom that was based on the vaccination practice (Phillips v. City of New York. (2014). In this case, the court consolidated the actions of the three plaintiffs. For various reasons, the courts granted the New York City Departments of education and Defendants City of New York motion and dismissed the three plaintiffs on the Amended Protest in its entirety. In reference to Philips vs. New York, number 14-2156-cv, Lynch, Chin and Korman who were the judges upheld the decision of Judge William Kuntz on finding the law passed on constitutional muster. In reviewing the case to terminate pursuant to rule, the judges were supposed to accept the realistic allegations that were set forth by the plaintiffs as true. The children of the three plaintiffs were therefore granted religious exemptions in reference to the mandatory vaccinations. However, despite their religious exemptions, the three plaintiffs still complained of their children’s exclusion from school on every occasion where their children’s schoolmate reported a vaccine preventable disease case. Vaccination against life-threatening diseases remains one of the greatest achievements in health in the United States history. Generally, millions of premature death cases have been prevented while countless children have been rescued from